In CSS, adjacent margins can sometimes overlap. This is known as “margin collapse”, and it has a reputation for being quite dastardly.
Here's a typical example, involving two sibling paragraphs:
Instead of sitting 48px apart, their 24px margins merge together, occupying the same space!
This idea might sound simple, but if you've been writing CSS for a while, you've almost certainly been surprised when margins either don't collapse, or they collapse in weird and unexpected ways. In real-world projects, all kinds of circumstances can complicate matters.
The good news is that once we understand the rules behind this notoriously-confusing mechanism, it becomes a lot clearer, and a lot less surprising ✨.
In this tutorial, we're going to dive deep into the details and figure it out. No more being bewildered!
Link to this headingOnly vertical margins collapse
When margin-collapse was added to the CSS specification, the language designers made a curious choice: horizontal margins shouldn't collapse.
In the early days, CSS wasn't intended to be used for layouts. The people writing the spec were imagining headings and paragraphs, not columns and sidebars.
So that's our first rule: only vertical margins collapse.
Here's a live-editable example. If you're using a desktop browser, pop open the developer tools and inspect the margins for yourself:
Link to this headingOnly adjacent elements collapse
It is somewhat common to use the
<br /> tag (a line-break) to increase space between block elements.
Regrettably, this has an adverse effect on our margins:
<br /> tag is invisible and empty, but any element between two others will block margins from collapsing. Elements need to be adjacent in the DOM for their margins to collapse.
Link to this headingThe bigger margin wins
What about when the margins are asymmetrical? Say, the top element wants 72px of space below, while the bottom element only needs 24px?
The bigger number wins.
This one feels intuitive if you think of margin as "personal space". In this moment in history, it's socially responsible to keep 6 feet apart. If someone wants even more space — say, 8 feet — we'll need to keep 8 feet apart in order to satisfy both personal-space requirements.
Link to this headingNesting doesn't prevent collapsing
Alright, here's where it starts to get weird. Consider the following code:
We're dropping our first paragraph into a containing
<div>, but the margins will still collapse!
How can this be? Well, it turns out that many of us have a misconception about how margins work.
Margin is meant to increase the distance between siblings. It is not meant to increase the gap between a child and its parent's bounding box; that's what padding is for.
Margin will always try and increase distance between siblings, even if it means transferring margin to the parent element! In this case, the effect is the same as if we had applied the margin to the parent
<div>, not the child
“But that can't be!”, I can hear you saying. “I've used margin before to increase the distance between the parent and the first child!”
There are some conditions that must be satisfied in order for the margin to be transferred to the parent (and collapsed):
- No other elements in-between (see earlier rule, about the
- The parent element doesn't have a
- The parent element doesn't have any padding or border along the relevant edge.
That last condition is really common, so let's look at a quick example. In this case, our nested child can't combine margin with the next paragraph, because the parent has some padding in the way:
You can think of padding/border as a sort of wall; if it sits between two margins, they can't collapse, because there's a wall in the way. The width doesn't matter, either; even 1px of padding will interfere with margin collapse.
Link to this headingMargins can collapse in the same direction
So far, all the examples we've seen involve adjacent opposite margins: the bottom of one element overlaps with the top of the next element.
Surprisingly, margins can collapse even in the same direction.
Here's what this looks like in code:
You can think of this as an extension of the previous rule. The child margin is getting “absorbed” into the parent margin. The two are combining, and are subject to the same rules of margin-collapse we've seen so far (eg. the biggest one wins).
This can lead to big surprises. For example, check out this common frustration:
In this scenario, you might expect the two sections to be touching, with the margin applied inside each container:
This seems like a reasonable assumption, since the
<section>s have no margin at all! The intention seems to be to increase the space within the top of each box, to give the paragraphs a bit of breathing room.
The trouble is that 0px margin is still a collapsible margin. Each section has 0px top margin, and it gets combined with the 32px top margin on the paragraph. Since 32px is the larger of the two, it wins.
Link to this headingMore than two margins can collapse
Margin collapse isn't limited to just two margins! In this example, 4 separate margins occupy the same space:
It's hard to see what's going on, but this is essentially a combination of the previous rules:
- Siblings can combine adjacent margins (if the first element has margin-bottom, and the second one has margin-top)
- A parent and child can combine margins in the same direction
Each sibling has a child that contributes a same-direction margin.
Here it is, in code. Use the devtools to view each margin in isolation:
The space between our
<section> has 4 separate margins competing to occupy that space!
headerwants space below itself
headerhas bottom margin, which collapses with its parent
headerwants space above itself
sectionhas top margin, which collapses with its parent
Ultimately, the paragraph has the largest cumulative margin, so it wins, and 40px separates the
Link to this headingNegative margins
Finally, we have one more factor to consider: negative margins.
Negative margins allow us to reduce the space between two elements. It lets us pull a child outside its parent's bounding box, or reduce the space between siblings until they overlap.
How do negative margins collapse? Well, it's actually quite similar to positive ones! The negative margins will share a space, and the size of that space is determined by the most significant negative margin. In this example, the elements overlap by 75px, since the more-negative margin (-75px) was more significant than the other (-25px).
What about when negative and positive margins are mixed? In this case, the numbers are
Why would we want to apply margins that have no effect?! Well, sometimes you don't control one of the two margins. Maybe it comes from a legacy style, or it's tightly ensconced in a component. By applying an inverse negative margin to the parent, you can "cancel out" a margin.
Of course, this is not ideal. Better to remove unwanted margins than to add even more margins! But this hacky fix can be a lifesaver in certain situations.
Link to this headingMultiple positive and negative margins
We've gotten pretty deep into the weeds here, and we have one more thing to look at. It's the "final boss" of this topic, the culmination of all the rules we've seen so far.
What if we have multiple margins competing for the same space, and some are negative?
If there are more than 2 margins involved, the algorithm looks like this:
- Find the largest positive margin
- Find the largest negative margin
- Add those two numbers together
Here's an example in code. Poke around in the devtools to see how it all works out:
In this example, our most significant positive margin is 30px. Our most significant negative margin is -20px. Therefore, we wind up with 10px of realized margin, since we add the positive and negative values together.
(No 3D illustration for this one — honestly, it was too busy and chaotic-looking to offer much clarity 😅)
Link to this headingFlow layout only
So far, all the examples we've seen have assumed that we're "in-flow"; we're not repositioning things with Grid or Flexbox.
When items are aligned with either Grid or Flexbox, or taken out-of-flow (eg. floats, absolute positioning), margins will never collapse. This can be surprising when combined with certain techniques, like my Full Bleed layout. In these cases, you're better off using
gap instead of margin.
In fact, there's a growing movement of developers opting for layout components instead of margin. I think layout components are awesome, but I also recognize that margin is universal. Even if you decide to foresake it, odds are you'll still need to work on products that use it, or with developers who do.
Link to this headingContinuing the CSS journey
Whew, that was a lot of rules!
With a bit of practice, though, this stuff becomes second nature. Soon enough, you'll just know how this stuff works, you won't even have to think about it.
It also goes way beyond margin collapse — we cover everything you need to know to become a dazzlingly-competent CSS whiz. Check it out, if you're interested!
Link to this headingOne last thing
I'm curious to hear if this tutorial helped solidify your understanding of margin collapse!
Here's a quick Twitter-style poll that'll let me know whether this tutorial was effective or not:
If you answered “No”, would you mind reaching out on Twitter and letting me know which parts were confusing? This material will be part of my paid course, so I'm eager to make it as good as possible 🙏